A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
Blog Article
However, in an effort to strike a balance between the rights of citizens along with the plans that are executed because of the authorities with the welfare, financial progress and prosperity with the region, the Court did not produce a definitive ruling about the pending construction on the grid station, but, with the consent of both parties, ordered a review and report of grid project through the National Engineering Services of Pakistan (NESPAK) to recommend alterations and location alternatives.
one hundred and one . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Matter: Appeal At times it is actually handy for the Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to create an attempt to eliminate a case on merit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's arrived at into a stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for advantage disposal when it's got reached these stage. Read more
Life imprisonment is an alternative on the death penalty. In this sort of cases, the convicted person is sentenced to invest the remainder of their natural life at the rear of bars.
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not respond to inquiries seeking legal information or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed on the court in which the case continues to be or will be filed.
94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be nicely-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 days. If your appeal is just not decided within that timeframe, he/she will then strategy the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the 90 days for the department to act has already expired. Over the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided via the decision in the Supreme Court during the case of Dr.
The ICAP Staff Service Rules, 2011 were framed because of the respondent/Institute, these rules may not have the operates within a clear legal and regulatory framework in the respondent/Institute. 14. In view of what continues to be discussed higher than, without touching the merits of your case, the preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of your petition is sustained as well as petition is held to generally be not maintainable in terms of Article 199 with the Constitution for the reason that non???statutory rules of service cannot be enforced through writ of mandamus in terms of ratio from the judgment passed by the Supreme Court from the case of Pakistan Electric Power Company supra. Read more
Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment in the grid project and submitted that enough mitigation measures were in place to render any potential adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted for being created.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle proven more info by a court, which other courts are obligated to abide by.
Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it needs legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be generated and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
This case continues to be cited in a lot of subsequent judgments, particularly in cases involving constitutional legislation, judicial independence, along with the rule of legislation.
Consequently, it absolutely was held that the right to the healthy environment was part from the fundamental right to life and right to dignity, under Article 9 and 14 with the Pakistan Constitution, respectively. The Court ruled that the word “life” covers all aspects of human existence, all these amenities and services that a person is entitled to appreciate with dignity, legally and constitutionally.
In order to prove murder, there needs to be an intention to cause the death of that person along with the action of actually injuring them – and that injury subsequently leading to and causing the death of that person.
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to determine a commission of internationally known and acknowledged experts to review and rule on foreseeable future grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power lines.